Article Text
How to understand them
Quality-adjusted life years
Abstract
Many health systems now use cost-effectiveness analysis to decide which interventions and programmes to fund. A key issue for such decision making is how to measure health outcomes from interventions to reflect changes in both health-related quality of life and life expectancy. For some decision makers, including the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence in the UK, the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) is central to health measurement. This article describes the concept of the QALY, its derivation, and its strengths and weaknesses.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Utility values associated with blindness in an adult population
- Health-related quality of life in patients with uveitis
- Value of the time trade off method for measuring utilities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
- Quality of life and relative importance: a comparison of time trade-off and conjoint analysis methods in patients with age-related macular degeneration
- Validity of the time trade-off and standard gamble methods of utility assessment in retinal patients
- Utility assessment among patients of primary angle closure/glaucoma in China: a preliminary study
- Developing a preference-based measure for weight-specific health-related quality of life in adolescence: the WAItE UK valuation study protocol
- Quantifying the utility of taking pills for preventing adverse health outcomes: a cross-sectional survey
- Comparison of direct and indirect methods of estimating health state utilities for resource allocation: review and empirical analysis
- A guide to health economic evaluations