Article Text
Commentary
Commentary
Statistics from Altmetric.com
I don’t know about you, but I often find myself telling medical students that neurologists are prouder of their history taking skills, and less sure of the connections of the red nucleus than the students might imagine. I tell them that history taking is (nearly) everything in headache and blackout assessment. But when the students ask me how to do it, I can find it quite difficult to explain. If I’m honest I tend to end up advocating a rather tenacious style: be forensic, don’t give up with the questions, phone the witness. I don’t mention the clinical “hunch” but I do probably use it more than I …
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Making the diagnosis in patients with blackouts: it’s all in the history
- Dissociative psychopathology, non-epileptic seizures, and neurology
- Clinical application of neuroimaging in epilepsy
- Dissociative (non-epileptic) seizures: tackling common challenges after the diagnosis
- Cross-sectional study of the hospital management of adult patients with a suspected seizure (EPIC2)
- Outpatient video EEG recording in the diagnosis of non-epileptic seizures: a randomised controlled trial of simple suggestion techniques
- Long term monitoring in refractory epilepsy: the Gowers Unit experience
- The safety of antiepileptic drug withdrawal in patients with non-epileptic seizures
- First seizures in adults
- Spectral power changes prior to psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: a pilot study