The distinction between the different causes of blackouts is an important and challenging clinical task. Given that treatment is very diagnosis-specific, therapeutic success depends entirely on the correct categorisation of the problem. However, despite impressive technological advances in brain imaging and improved access to tests such as video-EEG monitoring and tilt-table testing, the act of taking and interpreting the patient’s history is still the most important diagnostic tool in the evaluation of patients presenting with blackouts; in many if not most cases it provides the only diagnostic pointers. Here we discuss the potential and limitations of using factual information (what patients say about their attacks) and summarise the findings of a number of recent studies which suggest that taking note of how patients talk can help get the diagnosis right.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Epilepsy: mimics, borderland and chameleons
- Dissociative (non-epileptic) seizures: tackling common challenges after the diagnosis
- A nurse-led ‘first fitter’ clinic in a paediatric emergency department: an experience
- ASSESSMENT AND INVESTIGATION OF POSSIBLE EPILEPTIC SEIZURES
- First seizures in adults
- Does the primary literature provide support for clinical signs used to distinguish psychogenic nonepileptic seizures from epileptic seizures?
- The safety of antiepileptic drug withdrawal in patients with non-epileptic seizures
- The approach to patients with “non-epileptic seizures”
- Dissociative psychopathology, non-epileptic seizures, and neurology
- Sleeping in fits and starts: a practical guide to distinguishing nocturnal epilepsy from sleep disorders