Responses
Neurological letter from …
New York, written on election day
Compose a Response to This Article
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 23 February 2009
- Published on: 23 February 2009BipartisanshipShow More
Dear Editor,
It is not correct that the Democratic Party has historically been the major underwriter of biomedical research in the USA. American science, and biomedical science in particular, benefited historically from substantial bipartisan support. The major increase in NIH funding of the Clinton period owed at least as much to actions of moderate Republicans like Rep. John Porter (Republican of Illinois) an...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
Other content recommended for you
- Exome sequencing of 112 trios identifies recessive genetic variants in brain arteriovenous malformations
- NEWS
- Antiplatelets and antithrombotics in neurointerventional procedures: Guideline update
- Cerebrovascular injury as a risk factor for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
- Indications for the performance of intracranial endovascular neurointerventional procedures. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research
- Overview of the current concepts in the management of arteriovenous malformations of the brain
- Familial occurrence of brain arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review
- Concurrent arterial aneurysms in brain arteriovenous malformations with haemorrhagic presentation
- Critical assessment of the morbidity associated with ruptured cerebral arteriovenous malformations
- Common variants on 9p21.3 are associated with brain arteriovenous malformations with accompanying arterial aneurysms