Responses
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 14 April 2016
- Published on: 14 April 2016
- Published on: 14 April 2016
- Published on: 14 April 2016
- Published on: 14 April 2016
- Published on: 14 April 2016
- Published on: 14 April 2016The death of clinical neurology: not so soon please!Show More
Dear Editor,
I read with interest the editorial by Dr. Hawkes titled “I have stopped examining patients!”1. The title appropriately has an exclamation mark at the end highlighting his shocking claim. I have to commend Dr. Hawkes for finally coming out and admitting boldly and maybe somewhat proudly what most neurologists already know but are afraid to accept.
Bedside clinical neurology is a dyin...Conflict of Interest:
None declared. - Published on: 14 April 2016Careful Examination IrreplaceableShow More
Dear Editor,
Perhaps because I don't have Dr. Hawkes' degree of experience (I have approximately 25 years of practice experience), I disagree very strongly with his conclusion. Careful examination remains the cornerstone of neurologic practice. I agree that a great deal of information is gleaned from informal examination - watching the patient walk into the exam room, etc. I agree as well that for paroxysmal d...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared. - Published on: 14 April 2016The death of the neuro exam: not so soon please!Show More
Dear Editor,
I read the title of Dr. Hawkes’ editorial three times before I was certain I had read it correctly1. As a fourth year medical student about to apply for a neurology residency, I was initially bewildered. When I read on though, I was impressed not only with his candidness, but also by the validity of what he was saying; although I am a newcomer, it does not take long to appreciate that imaging is cent...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared. - Published on: 14 April 2016Premature closure and other unintended consequences of omitting the clinical examinationShow More
Dear Editor,
The admission that a neurologist has stopped examining patients(1) is a disturbing one, given the fact that "the practice of medicine is the art of drawing conclusions from incomplete evidence"(2), thanks to the fact that, as clinicians, "we work in a probabilisic enviroment in which the evidence we gather bears an imperfect relationship to its cause"(3).
Accordingly, the evidence initial...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared. - Published on: 14 April 2016A plea to neurologists, especially privileged British neurologists.Show More
Sometimes it is necessary to make a point with overemphasis and we believe that was done in the letter by Chris Hawkes. We agree that it is essential to talk to a patient and to watch them and observe how they speak, what they are saying and what they are doing with their body as they walk in and out of a room. However, to exclude the examination is a form of conceit. The only reason that a very senior neurologist can o...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared. - Published on: 14 April 2016Stop examining patients? Stop investigating them also.Show More
I am in general agreement with the notion expressed in Professor Hawkes' editorial that many patients in neurology outpatient clinics do not need examination. Certainly, the full neurological examination has a rather Zen-like quality: it takes a great deal of work to master it and then one finds one doesn't really need it. However, I would like to express a number of disagreements with some of what Professor Hawkes wr...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.