Article Text

other Versions

Download PDFPDF
Cerebrospinal fluid shunt-induced chorea: case report and review of the literature on shunt-related movement disorders
  1. Claudio M de Gusmäo1,
  2. Aaron L Berkowitz2,
  3. Albert Y Hung2,
  4. M Brandon Westover2
  1. 1Neurology Department, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  2. 2Neurology Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Claudio M de Gusmao, Neurology Department, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Fegan 11, Boston, MA 02115, USA; claudio.degusmao{at}childrens.harvard.edu

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Introduction

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion by shunting provides effective management of hydrocephalus.1 However, complication rates of CSF shunts range from 5% to 50%.1–3 Most common are shunt infections and mechanical failures; these may lead either to underdrainage (with re-emergence of hydrocephalus) or overdrainage (with intracranial hypotension and its potential complications, eg, subdural hematoma).3 ,4 Misplacement and migration of shunt catheters may cause seizures, intracerebral haemorrhage, and/or focal neurologic deficits, such as hemiparesis.1 ,2 We report a case of hemichorea after CSF shunt placement, and review the literature on CSF shunt-related movement disorders.

Case report

A 20-year-old woman with congenital hydrocephalus treated by CSF shunting presented with a purulent discharge from the …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors CMdG: original idea, drafted the manuscript, edited images, performed literature review. ALB: original idea, revised the original manuscript and images, critical appraisal of literature review. AYH and MBW: critical review and modifications of the final manuscript; appraisal of literature review and associated media.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned. Externally peer reviewed. This paper was reviewed by Tony Amato-Watkins, Cardiff, UK.

Linked Articles

  • Editors' commentary
    Phil Smith Geraint Fuller