Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Vision loss in giant cell arteritis
  1. Laura Donaldson,
  2. Edward Margolin
  1. Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Dr Edward Margolin, Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Edward.margolin{at}uhn.ca

Abstract

Almost two-thirds of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) develop ocular symptoms and up to 30% suffer permanent visual loss. We review the three most common mechanisms for visual loss in GCA, describing the relevant ophthalmic arterial anatomy and emphasising how ophthalmoscopy holds the key to a rapid diagnosis. The short posterior ciliary arteries supply the optic nerve head, while the central retinal artery and its branches supply the inner retina. GCA has a predilection to affect branches of posterior ciliary arteries. The most common mechanism of visual loss in GCA is anterior arteritic optic neuropathy due to vasculitic involvement of short posterior ciliary arteries. The second most common cause of visual loss in GCA is central retinal artery occlusion. When a patient aged over 50 years has both anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy and a central retinal artery occlusion, the diagnosis is GCA until proven otherwise, and they should start treatment without delay. The least common culprit is posterior ischaemic optic neuropathy, resulting from vasculitic involvement of the ophthalmic artery and its pial branches. Here, the ophthalmoscopy is normal acutely, but MR imaging of the orbits usually shows restricted diffusion in the optic nerve.

  • neuro-ophthalmology
  • ophthalmology
  • vasculitis

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors Both EM and LD wrote the manuscript, revised for intellectual content and approved the final draft.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned. Externally peer reviewed by Susan Mollan, Birmingham, UK, and Mark Lawden, Leicester, UK.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Other content recommended for you