Table 1

Diagnostic tests

Diagnostic testAdvantagesDisadvantages and pitfallsRecommendations
India ink microscopyProvides rapid result within 10 min
Relatively cheap cf. culture methods
Operator-dependent—requires expertise in microscopy
Lower sensitivity and specificity for CM than CrAg—particularly in patients with lower fungal load (early in disease course/on ART)
Does not provide information on species or antifungal sensitivities
Do not perform unless CrAg unavailable on site
Cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) lateral flow assayVery high sensitivity and specificity in symptomatic patients—confers high negative predictive value
Provides rapid result within 10 min
Can be performed by staff with minimal clinical and laboratory training—making it cheap and scalable
Can be performed on serum samples in patients in whom CSF sample difficult to acquire
Remains positive for months—not useful for monitoring treatment response or diagnosing relapse
Titres connoting ‘positivity’ vary between manufacturers
Does not provide information on species or antifungal sensitivities
Perform CrAg in all patients with CSF high in lymphocytes and protein and/or low in glucose without an adequate explanation
In immunosuppressed patient with contraindication to LP, perform serum CrAg
Do not use CrAg to monitor treatment response or diagnose relapse
Fungal cultureIdentifies viable cells capable of reproduction, signalling active infection when specimen obtained from sterile site
High sensitivity and specificity in symptomatic patients
Provides detailed information on Cryptococcus species and drug sensitivities
Need for highly-trained staff—expensive and challenging in low-resource settings
Unless laboratory is aware that patient is immunocompromised, fungal culture is not carried out routinely—need to notify
Calls for energy-intensive and expensive incubation equipment, which may not be available in low-income settings
Risk of sterile culture if sample obtained some time after treatment started—false negative result
Where available, fungal culture should be performed for 21 days for all immunocompromised patients and people with sarcoidosis or cancer, with abnormal leucocyte count, protein and/or glucose in CSF
CSF fungal culture is the investigation of choice in suspected CM relapse
Unless dealing with disease recurrence, antifungal sensitivities have little bearing on treatment
GalactomannanReadily available fungal biomarker—detectable in both serum and CSFLow sensitivity for CM—most useful in suspected invasive aspergillosis
Moderate wait for results—in-house testing of serum samples usually gives result in 24–48 hours
Do not use in assessment of suspected CM
Beta D-glucanReadily available fungal biomarker—detectable in both serum and CSFPan-fungal marker—not specific to CM
Moderate wait for results—in-house testing or serum and CSF samples usually gives results in 24–48 hours
Do not use in assessment of suspected CM
Consider CM as possible cause of raised serum BDG in patients with compatible syndrome
  • ART, antiretroviral therapy; BDG, beta D-glucan; CM, cryptococcal meningitis; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; LP, lumbar puncture.