Abstract
Analysis of spontaneous nystagmus is important in the evaluation of dizzy patients. The aim was to measure how different visual conditions affect the properties of nystagmus using three-dimensional video-oculography (VOG). We compared prevalence, frequency and slow phase velocity (SPV) of the spontaneous nystagmus with gaze fixation allowed, with Frenzel’s glasses, and in total darkness. Twenty-five patients (35 measurements) with the peripheral vestibular pathologies were included. The prevalence of nystagmus with the gaze fixation was 40%, and it increased significantly to 66% with Frenzel’s glasses and regular room lights on (p < 0.01). The prevalence increased significantly to 83% when the regular room lights were switched off (p = 0.014), and further to 100% in total darkness (p = 0.025). The mean SPV of nystagmus with visual fixation allowed was 1.0°/s. It increased to 2.4°/s with Frenzel’s glasses and room lights on, and additionally to 3.1°/s, when the regular room lights were switched off. The mean SPV in total darkness was 6.9°/s. The difference was highly significant between all test conditions (p < 0.01). The frequency of nystagmus was 0.7 beats/s with gaze fixation, 0.8 beats/s in both the test conditions with Frenzel’s glasses on, and 1.2 beats/s in total darkness. The frequency in total darkness was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than with Frenzel’s glasses, and more so than with visual fixation (p = 0.003). The VOG in total darkness is superior in detecting nystagmus, since Frenzel’s glasses allow visual suppression to happen, and this effect is reinforced with gaze fixation allowed. Strict control of visual surroundings is essential in interpreting peripheral nystagmus.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fetter M (2000) Assessing vestibular function: which tests, when? J Neurol 247:335–342
Brandt T, Strupp M (2005) General vestibular testing. Clin Neurophysiol 116:406–426
Tschang HH, Harrison MS (1971) Note on the value of Frenzel’s glasses for the recognition and qualitative evaluation of spontaneous nystagmus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 34:362–366
Baba S, Fukumoto A, Aoyagi M, Koizumi Y, Ikezono T, Yagi T (2004) A comparative study on the observation of spontaneous nystagmus with Frenzel glasses and an infrared CCD camera. J Nippon Med Sch 71:25–29
Toshiaki Y, Yoshio O, Kayo S, Eriko K, Takayuki K (1997) 3D analysis of nystagmus in peripheral vertigo. Acta Otolaryngol 117:135–138
Yagi T, Kamura E, Shitara A (1999) Three-dimensional analysis of pressure nystagmus in labyrinthine fistulae. Acta Otolaryngol 119:150–153
Kim HA, Hong JH, Lee H, Yi HA, Lee SR, Lee SY, Jang BC, Ahn BH, Baloh RW (2008) Otolith dysfunction in vestibular neuritis: recovery pattern and a predictor of symptom recovery. Neurology 70:449–453
Juhola M, Aalto H, Jutila T, Hirvonen TP (2011) Signal analysis of three-dimensional nystagmus for otoneurological investigations. Ann Biomed Eng 39:973–982
Hart CW (1973) The ocular fixation index. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 82:848–851
Takemori S, Cohen B (1974) Loss of visual suppression of vestibular nystagmus after flocculus lesions. Brain Res 72:213–224
Alpert JN (1974) Failure of fixation suppression: a pathologic effect of vision on caloric nystagmus. Neurology 24:891–896
Cnyrim CD, Newman-Toker D, Karch C, Brandt T, Strupp M (2008) Bedside differentiation of vestibular neuritis from central “vestibular pseudoneuritis”. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79:458–460
Acknowledgments
The study was supported by research grants from Helsinki University Central Hospital.
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hirvonen, T.P., Juhola, M. & Aalto, H. Suppression of spontaneous nystagmus during different visual fixation conditions. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269, 1759–1762 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1824-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1824-3