The prediction of saliva swallowing frequency in humans from estimates of salivary flow rate and the volume of saliva swallowed

https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(95)00004-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Saliva swallowing frequency is an important factor in models of oral clearance. It varies widely among individuals, and the basis for that variation has not been established. This study evaluated the use of unstimulated flow rate and the volume of saliva swallowed as predictors of swallowing frequency in 128 first-year dental students. A microphone was placed over the larynx, and swallowing activity was recorded for 30 min between 3–6:00 p.m.. The average interval between swallows was determined, and individuals retained saliva in the mouth for a period equal to that time. Retained saliva was spat out, and volume was determined gravimetrically. Four replicate tubes were collected. Flow rate was determined as sample volume over average swallow time. A subset of 10 individuals was measured on two further occasions 2–3 months apart. An independent estimate of flow rate was taken on the second occasion. Repeat-measures analysis of variance and intraclass correlations were used to estimate the reproducibility of replicate volumes, and of measurements taken on different occasions. Associations between swallowing interval, saliva volume, and flow rate were evaluated by multiple regression. Replicate volumes were highly reproducible, as were measurements of volumes, swallow times, and flow rates on different occasions. Saliva volume and flow rate jointly accounted for 99% of variance in swallowing intervals. Swallowing intervals were shortest for individuals who combined high flow rates with small saliva volumes; current models suggest that their oral clearance might be most efficient. Swallowing intervals were longest for individuals with low flow rates and large volumes; their oral clearance might be the least efficient.

References (15)

  • R.L. Speirs et al.

    Subjective assessment of liquid volumes by humans during swallowing

    Archs oral Biol.

    (1988)
  • H. Becks et al.

    Human saliva XIII: rate of flow of resting saliva of healthy individuals

    J. Dent. Res.

    (1943)
  • S.P. Calloway et al.

    Frequency of swallowing in duodenal ulceration and hiatus hernia

    Br. Med. J.

    (1982)
  • L.M.C. Collins et al.

    The surface area of the adult human mouth and thickness of the salivary film covering the teeth and oral mucosa

    J. Dent. Res.

    (1987)
  • C. Dawes

    A mathematical model of salivary clearance of sugar from the oral cavity

    Caries Res.

    (1983)
  • Y.V. Kapila et al.

    Relationship between swallow rate and salivary flow

    Dig. Dis. Sci.

    (1984)
  • F. Lagerlöf et al.

    The volume of saliva in the mouth before and after swallowing

    J. Dent. Res.

    (1984)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (84)

  • Using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Sialorrhea in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

    2023, Advances in Radiation Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    First, we qualitatively and quantitatively measured the patient's baseline degree of sialorrhea. We used the Sialorrhea Scoring Scale (Table 1),5-8 which was developed for Parkinson's disease and validated for ALS, as well the Oral Secretion Scale (Table 2),9-12 which was designed specifically for sialorrhea in ALS. These scales are both simple rating tools in which patients report the severity of their sialorrhea symptoms.

  • Salivary α-amylase activity and flow rate explain differences in temporal flavor perception in a chewing gum matrix comprising starch-limonene inclusion complexes

    2022, Food Research International
    Citation Excerpt :

    The high turnover of saliva due to high sFR coupled with the low sAA levels may have limited the amylose’s digestion into sweeter-tasting oligosaccharide products. The “wash out” effect by high sFR could explain the AM-FH lower citation ratings of Citrus and Sweet as it has been found that swallowing intervals were shortest for individuals with high flow rate (Rudney, 1995). Additionally, variable starch hydrolysis rates could also explain the Sweet-Bitter suppression observed in both the overall and the cluster TCATA curves (Figs. 2 & 5).

  • Is rat a good model for assessment of particulate-based taste-masked formulations?

    2020, European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Temperature was set to 37 °C using an MB-5 heat circulator and water bath (Julabo GmbH, Germany). The volume of saliva used in the oral cavity dissolution method was based on average saliva volumes reported for adult humans [42,43]. Multiple small-scale dissolution vessels were kept at 37 °C each with a magnetic stirrer in a setup as was previously described for human saliva dissolution studies [29].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text