Review
Physiotherapy for functional (psychogenic) motor symptoms: A systematic review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.05.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

Functional (psychogenic) motor symptoms (FMS), also called motor conversion disorder or non-organic motor symptoms are a common cause of disability and distress among patients attending neurology and neurorehabilitation services. Patients with FMS are often referred for physiotherapy but it is not clear whether this is effective. Here we aim to systematically review the literature regarding physiotherapy interventions for patients with functional motor symptoms.

Methods

Systematic review of databases with reference search for period 1950 to September 2012.

Results

There was only one controlled intervention study with a historical control group and 28 case series or reports describing interventions. The total number of patients in all studies was 373. Physiotherapy most commonly occurred in the context of multidisciplinary treatment and involved a motor learning approach. Novel approaches included the use of distraction techniques and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) machine. Deceptive behavioural techniques have also been described. Most studies reported benefit from physical treatment, including some studies with long-term follow up.

Conclusions

Patients with FMS are commonly encountered in neurological practice and are often referred for physiotherapy. The existing data to guide physiotherapy treatment for FMS is of low quality and limited in scope. However, it suggests potential positive effects and provides a useful resource for developing and testing physiotherapy interventions in future studies.

Introduction

Patients frequently present with neurological symptoms that are unexplained by neurological disease [1]. These symptoms, once called hysterical, are now referred to as psychogenic, functional, non-organic, dissociative or as conversion symptoms. The diagnosis of “functional neurological symptoms” is one of the commonest made in neurological practice, and patients with functional motor symptoms (e.g. hemiparesis, gait disturbance, tremors) are at least as common as those with multiple sclerosis [2], [3]. Such patients have levels of disability, distress and health care usage that equals and in some cases surpasses patients with neurodegenerative disease [4].

Physiotherapy is considered an important component of treatment by most clinicians. In a survey of 526 neurologists 79% considered physiotherapy to be at least somewhat effective and at least as effective as psychotherapy alone [5]. In another survey of 702 neurophysiotherapists in the UK most (77%) said they saw patients with FMS and a quarter said they spent more than 10% of their time on this patient group [6]. They had generally positive attitudes to these patients with 82% responding that they felt that physiotherapy was an appropriate treatment. However, many reported a lack of evidence to support treatment as well as a lack of support from neurologists. Another issue identified was that some physiotherapists (14%) were concerned that they were working outside the boundaries of their profession and that psychological therapy was not available to complement physical intervention.

Against this background we present the results of a systematic review of the use of physiotherapy in the treatment of patients with FMS in order to explore the evidence base for physical interventions in this condition and to determine directions for future research.

Section snippets

Methods

A search for articles published on physical interventions for FMS was conducted using Medline, Ovid (from 1950 to 5 September 2012) and CINAHL (1981 to 5 September 2012) databases. Given the range of terms used to describe patients with FMS, our search strategy included the exploded MeSH terms: conversion disorder, dissociative disorders, somatoform disorders, and key words “psychogenic”, “medically unexplained” and “hysteri*”. These terms were combined with exploded MeSH terms: physical

Results

A flow chart of our search results is given in Fig. 1. We found 355 articles with Medline and 283 with CINAHL. Using our inclusion criteria, 29 were judged to be relevant. There were no prospective controlled trials specifically assessing the effect of physical interventions. There was one retrospective controlled study [7], the remaining studies were case series or single patient reports. A summary of these studies is given in Table 1, with selected studies with n > 10 described in more detail

Discussion

In this systematic review we identified 29 studies evaluating the effect of physical treatment of adults with FMS. The papers were published between 1970 and 2012, and the total number of patients represented by these studies is only 373 adults, a surprisingly low number considering the prevalence of this condition and the reportedly common use of physiotherapy in treatment [6]. There were no randomised controlled trials, one retrospective study with a historical control, and 28 case

Limitations

A major limitation of our study is that we searched only in the literature since 1950. We are aware of work that predates this, especially in the early 20th century [65], [66] which has some elements still relevant today but was outside the scope of this review. In addition it is possible that the treatment effects described in these studies of physical intervention rely not on the physiotherapy offered, but the psychological effects of explanation and encouragement or the individual

Conclusions

We found 29 published papers describing physiotherapy for FMS, with no randomised controlled trials and only one controlled study among a total of 373 subjects. These studies, despite their limitations show encouraging results with improvement in 60 to 70% of patients. Combining a motor relearning with behavioural approach was the most common approach. There was some support for addressing erroneous illness beliefs as part of rehabilitation by communication of the diagnosis and rationale for

Conflict of interest

All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at http://www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf. The authors have no competing interests to report.

Acknowledgments

MJE is supported by an NIHR Clinician Scientist Grant. JS is supported by an NHS Scotland NRS Career Research Fellowship.

References (68)

  • AM Delamater et al.

    The behavioral treatment of hysterical paralysis in a ten-year-old boy: a case study

    J Am Acad Child Psychiatry

    (1983)
  • CM Monzoni et al.

    How do neurologists discuss functional symptoms with their patients: a conversation analytic study

    J Psychosom Res

    (2011)
  • Y Cojan et al.

    Motor inhibition in hysterical conversion paralysis

    Neuroimage

    (2009)
  • ED Adrian et al.

    The treatment of some common war neuroses

    Lancet

    (1917)
  • M Binzer et al.

    Clinical characteristics of patients with motor disability due to conversion disorder: a prospective control group study

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

    (1997)
  • J Stone et al.

    The symptom of functional weakness: a controlled study of 107 patients

    Brain

    (2010)
  • A Carson et al.

    Disability, distress and unemployment in neurology outpatients with symptoms “unexplained by organic disease”

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

    (2011)
  • AJ Espay et al.

    Opinions and clinical practices related to diagnosing and managing patients with psychogenic movement disorders: an international survey of movement disorder society members

    Mov Disord

    (2009)
  • MJ Edwards et al.

    Physiotherapists and patients with functional (psychogenic) motor symptoms: a survey of attitudes and interest

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

    (2012)
  • L Wojtecki et al.

    Transient improvement of psychogenic (proprio-) spinal-like myoclonus to electrical nerve stimulation

    Mov Disord

    (2009)
  • D Maltête et al.

    TENS for the treatment of propriospinal myoclonus

    Mov Disord

    (2008)
  • G Linazasoro et al.

    Etiological and therapeutical observations in a case of belly dancer's dyskinesia

    Mov Disord

    (2005)
  • K Sugimoto et al.

    Response of spinal myoclonus to a combination therapy of autogenic training and biofeedback

    Biopsychosoc Med

    (2007)
  • D Foley-Nolan et al.

    Post whiplash dystonia well controlled by transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation (TENS): case report

    J Trauma

    (1990)
  • R Savage

    EMG biofeedback in the treatment of hysterical paralysis: a case report

    Physiother Can

    (1984)
  • FC Moene et al.

    A randomised controlled clinical trial on the additional effect of hypnosis in a comprehensive treatment programme for in-patients with conversion disorder of the motor type

    Psychother Psychosom

    (2002)
  • AP Shapiro et al.

    Behavioural interventions in the rehabilitation of acute v. chronic non-organic (conversion/factitious) motor disorders

    Br J Psychiatry

    (2004)
  • R Heruti et al.

    Conversion motor paralysis disorder: analysis of 34 consecutive referrals

    Spinal Cord

    (2002)
  • C Dallocchio et al.

    The effects of physical activity on psychogenic movement disorders

    Mov Disord

    (2010)
  • D Ness

    Physical therapy management for conversion disorder: case series

    J Neurol Phys Ther

    (2007)
  • MA Delargy et al.

    Successful rehabilitation in conversion paralysis

    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)

    (1986)
  • FC Moene et al.

    The inpatient treatment of patients suffering from (motor) conversion symptoms: a description of eight cases

    Int J Clin Exp Hypn

    (1998)
  • KA Findlater

    A behavioural approach to the rehabilitation of longstanding hysterical quadriplegia: a case report

    Physiother Can

    (1986)
  • RH Withrington et al.

    Rehabilitation of conversion paralysis

    J Bone Joint Surg Br

    (1985)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text