Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 65, 15 January 2013, Pages 349-363
NeuroImage

Comments and Controversies
Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.001Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Abstract

Magnetoencephalographic (MEG) recordings are a rich source of information about the neural dynamics underlying cognitive processes in the brain, with excellent temporal and good spatial resolution. In recent years there have been considerable advances in MEG hardware developments and methods. Sophisticated analysis techniques are now routinely applied and continuously improved, leading to fascinating insights into the intricate dynamics of neural processes. However, the rapidly increasing level of complexity of the different steps in a MEG study make it difficult for novices, and sometimes even for experts, to stay aware of possible limitations and caveats. Furthermore, the complexity of MEG data acquisition and data analysis requires special attention when describing MEG studies in publications, in order to facilitate interpretation and reproduction of the results. This manuscript aims at making recommendations for a number of important data acquisition and data analysis steps and suggests details that should be specified in manuscripts reporting MEG studies. These recommendations will hopefully serve as guidelines that help to strengthen the position of the MEG research community within the field of neuroscience, and may foster discussion in order to further enhance the quality and impact of MEG research.

Keywords

Magnetoencephalography
MEG
Acquisition
Analysis
Connectivity
Source localization
Guidelines
Recommendations
Reproducible research
Spectral analysis

Cited by (0)