Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Dr Mumford has produced a comprehensive guide to aspiring medicolegal experts which is thought provoking and essential reading for any practitioner in the medicolegal process. He has covered all main problems and possible pitfalls encountered when a doctor is instructed as an expert, pointed out ways to avoid embarrassment or worse, highlighted the mindset likely to be encountered in a court, whether from a judge or counsel, and given clear guidance on the personality types likely to be on parade, whether in the guise of the legal personnel or medical opponent.
From my standpoint as counsel there are several essential elements to consider whenever an expert is called for; some already covered, but a few need further highlighting.
Dr Mumford has modestly omitted to mention an essential quality in an expert …
Footnotes
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Roles and responsibilities of medical expert witnesses
- On being an expert witness in sexual and reproductive health
- The expert witness: the doctor’s perspective
- When worlds collide: the uncomfortable romance between law and neurology
- Historians’ testimony on “common knowledge” of the risks of tobacco use: a review and analysis of experts testifying on behalf of cigarette manufacturers in civil litigation
- Judicial attitudes to expert evidence in children’s cases
- “Shaken baby” expert with unconventional views struck off
- External second opinions: building trust between health professionals and families
- Expert witnesses: stuck between the courts and the GMC
- The expert witness: the lawyer’s perspective