Article Text

Download PDFPDF

PN Readers Survey
Practical Neurology reader survey 2016
Free
  1. Geraint N Fuller1,
  2. Philip E M Smith2
  1. 1Department of Neurology, Gloucester Royal Hospital, Gloucester, UK
  2. 2University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Geraint N Fuller, Department of Neurology, Gloucester Royal Hospital, Gloucester GL1 3NN, UK; geraint.fuller{at}glos.nhs.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

The essential point of Practical Neurology is that it is practical in the sense of being useful for everyone who sees neurological patients and who wants to keep up to date, and safe, in managing them. In other words this is a journal for jobbing neurologists who plough through the tension headaches and funny turns week in and week out.

Introduction

The success of most academic journals can be captured in a single number, its impact factor. This provides a measure of the importance of the research being published and the degree to which it influences other authors in the field. Practical Neurology, in contrast, defines its impact by other measures: how often it is read; how useful are the articles to clinical neurologists; how often it influences clinicians in the clinic and whether it is interesting, entertaining and thought provoking.

In the spring of this year, we undertook a web-based questionnaire to find out how well the journal serves its readers, looking for your comments and …

View Full Text

Linked Articles

  • Editors' commentary
    Phil E M Smith Geraint N Fuller

Other content recommended for you