You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Test yourself
A diagnostic conundrum
  1. Stephen Keddie1,
  2. Zane Jaunmuktane2,
  3. Sebastian Brandner2,
  4. Sachit Shah3,
  5. Paul Maddison4,
  6. Jeremy H Rees5,
  7. Michael G Hanna1,
  8. Michael P T Lunn1,
  9. Mary M Reilly1,
  10. Alexander M Rossor1,
  11. Aisling S Carr1
  1. 1 Department of Molecular Neuroscience, MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, National Hospital of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
  2. 2 Division of Neuropathology, National Hospital of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCL Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
  3. 3 Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital of Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
  4. 4 Department of Neurology, Nottingham University Hospital Trust, Nottingham, UK
  5. 5 Department of Neuro-oncology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Aisling S Carr, Department of Molecular Neuroscience, MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, National Hospital of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCL Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK; aisling.carr{at}uclh.nhs.uk

https://doi.org/10.1136/practneurol-2017-001801

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Presenting complaint

    A 26-year-old man was referred with facial weakness, dysarthria, dysphagia, ophthalmoparesis and severely weak and wasted legs. His symptoms had begun when aged 20 with electric shock pains and paraesthesia in both feet progressing over 6 months to the lower calves. He then developed buttock numbness and occasional faecal incontinence. By age 22, he had diffuse lower limb weakness and wasting, with difficulty standing from a seated position and frequent tripping. He became wheelchair-dependent within 3 years.

    Over the same time period, he developed progressive facial weakness, bilateral ptosis, slurred speech, difficulty chewing and swallowing and lost 10 kg of weight. He reported hearing difficulty, and an audiogram showed high-frequency hearing loss. Important negatives included absence of upper limb symptoms, autonomic, cardiac, respiratory or cognitive dysfunction.

    He was from a non-consanguineous, Lithuanian background and the eldest of three siblings. He was born following a normal pregnancy and delivery, and motor development was normal.

    He had sustained a left corneal abrasion with visual impairment following an accidental chemical injury aged 14. During the initial investigation of his symptoms (age 23), he was found to have a choroid plexus lesion in the fourth ventricle. It was completely resected and histology confirmed benign choroid plexus papilloma WHO grade I. Postoperative neuro-oncology discussion deemed the lesion cured.

    Examination

    He had bilateral ptosis, bilateral facial wasting and could not close his mouth against gravity (figure 1A). Visual acuity was reduced to perception of light on the left, 6/9 on the right. There was almost complete, complex ophthalmoplegia (figure 1B) without fatiguability. Trigeminal sensation was reduced. He could not achieve eyelid closure; frontalis, buccinator and orbicularis oris were symmetrically weak. His speech was dysarthric and his tongue was weak. His uvula was central with symmetrical palatal movement, but the gag reflex was reduced.

    Figure 1

    Clinical examination at age 26. …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Contributors SK collected data and wrote most of the first draft of the paper. ZJ and SB provided the histopathology images and description. All other authors provided detailed written edits and multiple further drafts of the case report for publication. All authors work fulfilled the following: substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work or the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data; drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; gave final approval of the version published; agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

    • Funding AR is funded by a Wellcome Trust Postdoctoral Fellowship for Clinicians (110043/Z/15/Z).

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Patient consent Obtained.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

      This paper was reviewed by Robert Hadden, London, UK.

    Other content recommended for you